Subject	Different fuel burn rates for ethanol vs non-ethanol
Posted by	Greg D. (Specialty-Z) on June 06, 2012 at 12:30 PM
	This message has been viewed 195 times.
In Reply To	hard start issue solved... maybe...i think it was the 94 gas posted by Jiro on June 05, 2012 at 11:33 PM
Message	94 octane also burns slower even when both are non ethanol. The start up fuel maps were simply too rich to start well with 94 octane. The 94 octane would require a different program to run correctly.
Follow Ups	hard start issue solved... maybe...i think it was the 94 gas - Jiro 23:33:55 06/05/12 That may be a coincidence.. - KongZTT GT28RS MD 23:49:33 06/05/12 how bout corrosion@the temp sensor, AAC-IACV might be it 2? (n/m) - Jiro 23:57:20 06/05/12 b/c i changed the connectors + temp sensor/connector - Jiro 23:58:38 06/05/12 You changed all the connectors? - KongZTT GT28RS MD 00:12:01 06/06/12 BTW.. just so you know.. - KongZTT GT28RS MD 00:14:44 06/06/12 yeah i changed all those connectors mentioned... (n/m) - Jiro 00:45:36 06/06/12 Re: You changed all the connectors? - MaxxAction 10:32:24 06/06/12 I think this may have something to do with 91 having ETHANOL - ZinnZ32 11:32:08 06/06/12 my motor runs better without boost on 91, but much better - fuzzymonkey 13:39:28 06/06/12 Different fuel burn rates for ethanol vs non-ethanol - Greg D. (Specialty-Z) 12:30:20 06/06/12 Is it safe to run a stock TT & ECU on 91 today? (n/m) - OverZealous (CT) 15:03:39 06/06/12 It will be lean and should be retuned for today's fuel. - Greg D. (Specialty-Z) 16:05:12 06/06/12
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.